Understanding the Selection Criteria for Journals and Conference Proceedings in Ei Compendex

For researchers and institutions aiming to publish in high-impact platforms, understanding the evaluation process of Ei Compendex is essential. This globally recognized indexing service applies a strict set of standards when selecting journals and conference proceedings to ensure academic rigor and relevance. Below is a detailed breakdown of the selection criteria used by Ei Compendex for both journals and conference proceedings.

Minimum Requirements for Journals Indexed by Ei Compendex

Ei Compendex initially filters journals using a set of basic qualifications. A journal must meet all of the following minimum standards:

• A valid and registered ISSN or EISSN

• Peer-reviewed editorial process

• Abstracts available in English

• A consistent publication schedule with at least two years of publishing history

• Clear publishing ethics statement

• Long-term digital preservation policy

Only journals meeting these minimum requirements will proceed to the next round of evaluation.

In-Depth Evaluation Criteria for Journals

After passing the initial screening, journals are assessed based on 18 qualitative and quantitative metrics across five main categories:

1. Editorial Policy

• Clearly defined editorial scope and peer-review model

• Diverse editorial board in terms of discipline and geography

• Global authorship representation

2. Content Quality

• Academic contribution to the field

• Alignment with the journal’s stated aims and scope

• Clarity of abstracts and readability of papers

• Use of standard Roman fonts for consistency

3. Journal Impact

• Citation analysis including self-citation rates

• Domestic ranking references, such as ISTIC for local journals

4. Publishing Regularity

• Consistent publishing schedule with no delays or interruptions

• Predictable article volume and frequency

5. Online Accessibility

• Content must be accessible online

• Clear digitization and preservation strategies

• Functional English-language journal homepage

• DOI (Digital Object Identifier) for each article

Minimum Requirements for Conference Proceedings

Similarly, Ei Compendex sets fundamental benchmarks for conference proceedings:

• Valid ISSN or EISSN

• Peer-reviewed full papers with English abstracts

• Online accessibility of the full text

• Statement on publishing ethics

• Long-term digital preservation plan

Only proceedings that meet these initial standards are further evaluated.

In-Depth Evaluation Criteria for Conference Proceedings

Conference proceedings undergo a similar 18-point evaluation across the following categories:

1. Conference Scope and Goals

• Focused and well-defined aims and scope

• Transparent peer-review process

• Diverse and internationally represented organizing and technical committees

• Global authorship coverage

2. Organizational Transparency

• Publicly disclosed collaborators and sponsors

• Clear submission guidelines for authors

• Transparent fee structure

3. Content Quality

• High-quality scientific writing and relevance to the field

• Readability and original contributions

• Consistency with the conference scope

• Proper formatting, including Roman font references

4. Conference Reputation

• Recognized academic status of organizing committees

• Inclusion in authoritative conference listings

5. Online Presence

• English-language conference homepage

• Homepage usability and professionalism

• Use of DOIs for digital traceability

Final Thoughts

The selection process for Ei Compendex indexing is meticulous and comprehensive. Authors, conference organizers, and institutions should ensure they align with both the basic requirements and the detailed evaluation metrics to improve their chances of being indexed.

For more insights into academic publishing standards and discovering top-tier conferences worldwide, visit iconf.org, your trusted source for curated, high-quality academic events.